Ukraine war to cause mass hunger in developing world, slow global growth

Russia-Ukraine conflict would cause widespread hunger...Read More

The Ukraine war threatens to hurt the world economy badly, both slashing the global growth rate and fueling hunger in the developing world.

In its latest assessment, the World Trade Organization says there are more shocks to come for the world, which is already reeling from two years of pandemic slump, supply chain obstacles, and monumental health crisis.

The TWO has cut its goods trade growth forecast for this year by about a third to 3 percent.

Simultaneously, a dip in commodity exports caused by the Ukraine war could cause mass hunger in developing countries.

The Geneva-based body revised predicted growth in goods trade volumes down from 4.7 percent but said a protracted conflict and an embargo on Russian energy supplies could reduce it to 0.5 percent.

The WTO also cut forecasts for growth in gross domestic product from 4.1 percent to 2.8 percent in 2022, rising to 3.2 percent in 2023. It also warned that lockdowns in Chinese cities to prevent the spread of coronavirus are again disrupting seaborne trade.

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine, big exporters of grain and fertilizer, could cause widespread hunger, said WTO Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala as she warned against export restrictions or food hoarding.

“Smaller supplies and higher prices for food mean that the world’s poor could be forced to do without. This must not be allowed to happen,”she said. 

The war is taking place as other factors impact global trade, including the latest COVID-19 lockdowns in China which are again disrupting maritime trade just as supply chain pressures appeared to be easing.  

Ms. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala urged governments to work with multilateral organizations like WTO to facilitate trade. 

“In a crisis, more trade is needed to ensure stable, equitable access to necessities. Restricting trade will threaten the wellbeing of families and businesses and make more fraught the task of building a durable economic recovery from COVID‑19,” she said. 

Given the scant data on the economic impact of the conflict, WTO economists have had to rely on simulations for their assumptions about global Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth through 2023. 

Their estimates capture the direct impact of the war, including the destruction of infrastructure and increased trade costs; the impact of Russian sanctions, including blocking Russian banks from the SWIFT international banking payments system; and reduced aggregate demand in the rest of the world – in part due to rising uncertainty. 

WTO said world GDP at market exchange rates should increase by 2.8 percent this year, or 1.3 percentage points down from the previous forecast.  

Output growth should rise to 3.2 percent in 2023, “assuming persistent geopolitical and economic uncertainty”, which is close to the 3.0 percent average rate for the period 2010-2019. 

In the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) region — created after the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, and which excludes Ukraine — GDP is expected to drop 7.9 percent, leading to a 12 percent decline in imports. 

However, exports should increase by nearly five percent as other countries continue to rely on Russian energy. 

“If the situation were to change, we might see stronger export volume growth in other fuel producing regions,” said WTO. 

Given the current GDP assumptions, the agency has projected that merchandise trade volume growth this year could be as low as 0.5 percent or as high as 5.5 percent. Figures will be updated in October or earlier if warranted.  

World merchandise trade volume grew roughly twice as fast as world GDP in the two decades before the 2007-2008 global financial crisis.  The ratio fell to around 1:1 on average in the wake of the crisis.  

If the current forecast plays out, it suggests there will be no fundamental change in the relationship between trade and output.  

“Risks to the forecast are mixed and difficult to assess objectively,” WTO said.  “There is some upside potential if the war in Ukraine ends sooner than expected, but substantial downside risks could emerge if fighting persists for a long time or if the conflict escalates.” 

World fuel prices were already rising prior to the war. Last month, the benchmark price for crude oil was $118 per barrel, up 38 percent from January, and more than 80 percent year on year.  Daily prices have moderated recently, from a peak of $128 per barrel on 8 March to $104 on 1 April.  

Unlike oil prices, the cost of natural gas has diverged strongly across regions, it said.  In Europe – where many countries still rely on Russian supplies – the price rose 45 percent between January and March, to $41 per million British thermal units (Btu).  The price has remained relatively low in the United States, at roughly $4.9 per million Btu. 

WTO said higher oil prices may reduce real incomes and import demand worldwide, while higher natural gas prices would probably have a greater impact in Europe. 

Categories
Economy

Iftikhar Ali is a veteran Pakistani journalist, former president of UN Correspondents Association, and a recipient of the Pride of Performance civil award
No Comment

Leave a Reply

*

*

RELATED BY

Cricket with Hasan Jalil Views News Production

Cybertex Institute of Technology

Views and News – A New Star Rises

VIEWS AND NEWS

Views&News is a diversity magazine covering arts, culture, business, economy, politics and international affairs. The magazine is part of Views News International company, which also offers services including media consultation, script writing, documentaries, video productions and presentations. We can be reached at editor@viewsnews.net

Subscribe to Views and News